C:\> You are now connected to localhost on port 25
Results of Survey – No x32 bit Version of for Exchange 2010 Print E-mail
Written by Andy Grogan   
Sunday, 21 June 2009 21:36

First of all, I would like to thank all of the people whom took the time to complete the above survey. There were a total of 24 respondents – which I understand is not representative of the Exchange community as a whole, but there is certainly some interesting views portrayed within the results.

Essentially the key question that I asked was about how people feel about Exchange 2010 being completely x64 – the results of which are quite interesting, especially when you then move onto review exactly how much this affects people. 33.33% of people whom responded are pleased that Microsoft are moving away from x32, where as 33.33% of people are finding it a bit of a pain – this becomes more interesting when you see that although 33.33% find it a pain – overall 70.83% of respondents say it will NOT effect them financially or in testing.

My own personal view still remains divided at this stage – I can see that major steps forward, but I can see the “little person” being left behind – however, I do not doubt for one second – that inevitably this is the way forward.

Once again thank you to all respondents – I have enclosed a copy of the FULL unaltered results in the PDF which can be downloaded below – if you have any views – please feel free to post them as comments.

Results of Survey [900K]

Cheers

A

Last Updated on Sunday, 21 June 2009 21:37
 
Exchange 2007 CCR – Going Pro (as in Production) – Part 1 – some food for thought (or perhaps not)… Print E-mail
Written by Andy Grogan   
Tuesday, 26 May 2009 21:03

I have for a little while wanted to put together a set of articles which attempt to explore the mindset of CCR clustering when being put to work in a production environment. Essentially my line of thinking (at least on the surface as this is a huge subject) is to go through some of the thought processes which might lead you (as an Exchange Admin) to the point where you are happy with the concepts of CCR clustering and are sure that it is for you within your Exchange Environment.

This article is along the same lines (although a little more detailed) as the article that I did on Hub Transport Specification which can be found here: http://www.telnetport25.com/component/content/article/31-exchange-2007--hub-transport-/122-suggested-hub-transport-hardware-config-for-exchange-2007-installations-of-5000-users.html

As mentioned this is a very large subject and contains quite a bit of varied theory as well as the usual technical staff that I like to throw in (for example I have a few CCR construction scripts that I would like to throw into a later part).

In the main the reasons for this series are:

  1. I have been working on a large production roll out of Exchange CCR (I know I always seem to be working on a large deployment of CCR into production) – but I have been considering (almost cliché) what is it all about really – does CCR really have to be the overall option when your really consider your overall Infrastructure environment?
  2. I totally trashed my CCR lab by accident and decided that it was not worth restoring from backup (I had made so many changes to the CCR configuration it was probably better to start from scratch) therefore I developed some scripts that make the process of deploying CCR on Windows 2008 much more straight forward
  3. I have been comparing some of my earlier posts about CCR to Microsoft’s TechNet deployment guidelines to ensure that my own personal thoughts were inline with general best practices

For information (and I include them as they are a darn good read) – the Microsoft articles are now the basis for much of my meanderings on CCR (as well as some good ole life experiences)

Last Updated on Tuesday, 26 May 2009 21:04
Read more...
 
SQL 2008 – Changing the Default Collation Settings on the SQL Engine – Be Careful… Print E-mail
Written by Andy Grogan   
Saturday, 23 May 2009 17:40

Technically I have been taking a (small) break from Exchange shenanigans recently with a shift in focus to SQL server 2008. Now I personally classify myself as a “SQL hobbyist” rather than expert, where I fill in within my organisation for an absent SQL Server DBA post.

Therefore this post might seem a little elementary to some of the SQL guru’s out there, but I decided to write about it - as given the amount of time that I have spent on this today I would not wish for someone else to lose 7 hours of their life to the same fate!

On a separate note – I think that SQL is an excellent product – and the tomfoolery that this article is based upon is more about a problem with the vendor of one particular item of software – rather than an issue with SQL server.

Essentially the scenario was as such:

My company had (operative word there) a number of SQL 2000 installations, 4 of which where were clustered instances (Active / Passive), between all of the instances there were (are) around 112 SQL databases of varying degrees of importance to the organisation (ranging from REALLY Important – to “Snooze”). The view was (and is) to consolidate those installations down into fewer SQL instances – and replace the clusters with Database Replication / Mirroring.

Of course another mitigating factor of the project was to get my company off of SQL 2000 and onto a non extended support platform, we decided to skip SQL 2005 and take the jump to SQL 2008 (much to the disgust of many of our SQL application suppliers – whom seem to display amazing levels of ineptitude when asked if they support the latest platform – but this is a rant that is worthy of a post in its own right).

The first set of SQL servers were moved very simply, I have been using a process where I clone the Security Logins and then Backup and Restore the databases to the new destination server, and then give the new server the same IP address as the previous instance (this was a precedent set prior to my arrival – personally I would have used FQDN) which has worked quite nicely.

Last Updated on Saturday, 23 May 2009 17:42
Read more...
 
New Surveys Section… Print E-mail
Written by Andy Grogan   
Sunday, 24 May 2009 15:24

Every now and then I would like to get the views of my readers on specific subjects.I really like receiving feedback about the site and perhaps most importantly Exchange Server :-) as it helps enhance what I am doing and indeed gives me ideas on subjects which I can ramble on about.

Therefore with this in mind I have introduced the new “Surveys” menu which is located in the left hand column of this site (at the moment – as (if) it grows I will need to move it elsewhere) – see below;

ScreenShot001

I do not want for the Surveys feature to be a marketing research gimmick, I do not supply data to companies – nor do I intend to – but as a tool to get the mood, feelings and thoughts of the people whom pass by on this site.

The surveys themselves do not keep any personally identifiable data about yourself – unless there is a question which requires it as part of the answer – all data such as this is kept strictly in line with my Data Protection – Privacy Disclaimer – Fair Processing Notice – which can be found in the “My Policy” Section of the site.

My first survey is entitled Exchange 2010 x32 Bit – as many of you are no doubt aware Microsoft have decided that Exchange 2010 will only be available in x64 form (and only x64) there will be no x32 bit version of the product for test labs, training or evaluation – the full low down is here: http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2009/05/19/451366.aspx

Last Updated on Sunday, 24 May 2009 15:25
Read more...
 
Installing Exchange 2010 on Windows Server 2008 – Understanding the Requirements for a Smooth installation Print E-mail
Written by Andy Grogan   
Sunday, 10 May 2009 10:43

As many of your will be aware the first publically available beta of Exchange 2010 was released on the 15th April 2009. Now between that time and now a number of really good articles have been released which explain how you can get up and running quickly with Microsoft’s latest offering of the worlds premier mail system, I alas have been a little bit lax in getting my own personal show on the road in regard to testing as I have had quite a lot on recently – however today I have managed to sit down properly and – from scratch began building my Exchange 2010 lab.

Now a lot of articles at the moment are focused around the actual install process of Exchange 2010 – which to be honest, aside from a few slight changes (to complement the rather large technology changes) there is little difference between 2010’s setup and Exchange 2007 (even at Beta Stage) – so rather than regurgitate what others have been explaining very well, I would like to focus more on explaining the requirements that your Windows 2008 server has to meet before you even consider installing Exchange 2010.

Microsoft have covered the minimum system requirements for Exchange 2010 which are located here: http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/2010/en/us/system-requirements.aspx – for those of us whom are testing within Virtual labs things like the the 4GB or RAM for a normal server plus 5MB per mailbox on a mailbox server can be relaxed a little bit – but if you are looking for good performance indicators within your testing you should stick to the recommended requirements.

Last Updated on Sunday, 10 May 2009 10:47
Read more...
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next > End >>

Page 1 of 5